John M. Drake
Recall that \( R_e = R_0 X/N \)
This implies that \( S_c = 1/R_0 \)
The complement of \( S_c \) is the critical vaccination proportion: \( p_c = 1-S_c = 1-\frac{1}{R_0} \)
A correction is needed for imperfect vaccines (e.g. SARS-CoV-2): \( p_c = \frac{1}{\epsilon}\left({1-\frac{1}{R_0}}\right) \) where \( \epsilon \) is the vaccine effectiveness at preventing transmissible infection.
We can obtain the same result by inspection of the equation for \( dY/dt \)
\[ \frac{dY}{dt} = \beta X \frac{Y}{N} - \gamma Y \]
Set \( dY/dt < 0 \) and solve
\[ \begin{align} \frac{dY}{dt} = \beta X \frac{Y}{N} - \gamma Y &< 0 \\ \beta \frac{X}{N} &< \gamma \\ \frac{X}{N} &< \frac{\gamma}{\beta} = \frac{1}{R_0} \end{align} \]
Due to the dependency upon social contact for transmission, an individual is afforded a degree of protection via the immunity of others in the population.
If contacts have been vaccinated, the probability of acquiring the disease is lower
Implication: Not everyone in a population needs to be immune to eradicate an infections disease
The extent of vaccination effort required is determined by \( R_0 \).
“Cocooning” strategies
Assumption: a fraction \( p \) of newborns are vaccinated/immunized at birth
\[ \begin{align} \frac{dS}{dt} &= \mu (1-p) - \beta SI - \mu S \\ \frac{dI}{dt} &= \beta SI - (\mu + \gamma) I \\ \frac{dR}{dt} &= \mu p + \gamma I - \mu R \end{align} \]
Set system to zero (equilibrium) and solving for \( I \) yields
\[ I^* = \frac{\mu}{\beta} (R_0 (1-p) -1) \]
Setting \( I^* \) to zero and solving for \( p \) yields
\[ p_c = 1-\frac{1}{R_0} \]
\[ \begin{align} \frac{dS}{dt} &= \mu - \beta SI - \mu S - \rho S\\ \frac{dI}{dt} &= \beta SI - (\mu + \gamma I) \\ \frac{dR}{dt} &= \rho S + \gamma I - \mu R \end{align} \]
Set system to zero (equilibrium) and solving for \( I \) yields
\[ I^* = \frac{\mu}{\beta} (R_0-1-\frac{\rho}{\mu}) \]
Setting \( I^* \) to zero and solving for \( \rho \) yields
\[ \rho_c = \mu (R_0 - 1) \]
Discussion: Provide an intuitive interpretation of \( \rho_c \)
Where infant vaccination and continuous vaccination are not feasible, a more economic and logistically efficient strategy may be pulsed vaccination
Pulsed vaccination seeks to vaccinate specific age cohorts at specified intervals
Mathematical model:
\[ \begin{align} \frac{dS}{dt} &= \mu - \beta S I - \mu S - p \sum_n=0^\infty S(nT^{-1})\delta (t-nT) \\ \frac{dI}{dt} &= \beta SI - (\mu +\gamma)I \end{align} \]
Linear stability analysis yields an eradication criterion
\[ \frac{(\mu T - p)(e^{\mu T -1})+\mu pT}{\mu T(p-1+e^{\mu T})} < \frac{1}{R_0} \]
Shulgin et al. 1998. Pulse vaccination strategy in the SIR epidemic model Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 60:1123-1148.
Failures in
Mathematical model:
\[ \begin{align} \frac{dS}{dt} &= \mu (1-p) - \beta SI - \mu S + \delta V\\ \frac{dI}{dt} &= \beta SI - (\mu + \gamma) I \\ \frac{dV}{dt} &= \mu p - (\mu + \delta) V \end{align} \]
Yielding the following eradication criterion
\[ p_c = \left( 1-\frac{1}{R_0} \right) \left( 1+ \frac{\delta}{\mu} \right) \]
Discussion: How would you incorporate these NPIs into a dynamical model?
\[ \begin{align} \frac{dS}{dt} &= \mu - \beta SI - \mu S \\ \frac{dI}{dt} &= \beta SI - (\mu + \gamma) I \\ \frac{dR}{dt} &= \mu + \gamma I - \mu R \end{align} \]
Presentations and exercises draw significantly from materials developed with Pej Rohani, Ben Bolker, Matt Ferrari, Aaron King, and Dave Smith used during the 2009-2011 Ecology and Evolution of Infectious Diseases workshops and the 2009-2019 Summer Institutes in Statistics and Modeling of Infectious Diseases.
Licensed under the Creative Commons attribution-noncommercial license, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0/. Please share and remix noncommercially, mentioning its origin.